tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5919517653892378810.post8009366379843750845..comments2023-10-20T07:52:16.424+00:00Comments on Journalology: Tags track growth in open access (and a dig at Philica)Matt Hodgkinsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02376788922895957748noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5919517653892378810.post-29570498042587254982008-06-05T21:09:00.000+00:002008-06-05T21:09:00.000+00:00i support the idea of Phillica.i personally don't ...i support the idea of Phillica.i personally don't like the concept of 'peer review'.if a scientific work has been done it has been done due to some reasons.why reject it for spelling mistakes and grammatical errors ? let the reader decides which one to read which one to not.also the assigned reviewers are not always related to the category of the article.so the reviews are often unjustified and irrelevant.partialism also comes into picture.i hav seen a lot of good articles to be rejected awhereas lot of bad ones get published.in this context,philica is a nice idea and it will be successful once people understand its advantage.Mrinmoyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05238972353052503774noreply@blogger.com