tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5919517653892378810.post770611627709330954..comments2023-10-20T07:52:16.424+00:00Comments on Journalology: What to do about late peer reviewers?Matt Hodgkinsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02376788922895957748noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5919517653892378810.post-89192866152234846972007-04-28T20:57:00.000+00:002007-04-28T20:57:00.000+00:00The new Seven Stones blog is also not a fan of thi...The new Seven Stones blog is also not a fan of this proposal. They suggest some sort of financial incentive, or a prize to the best reviewers, as well as publishing a list of reviewers. Pedro Beltrao, commenting on the post, also suggests an aggregated record of peer reviews across publishers - much like the new PublicationsList, but for reviewers.<BR/>http://blog-msb.embo.org/blog/2007/04/the_good_the_bad_and_the_ugly.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5919517653892378810.post-12600855976510019082007-04-28T18:33:00.000+00:002007-04-28T18:33:00.000+00:00The first journal to threaten me with such "punish...The first journal to threaten me with such "punishments" will receive by return post a letter requesting that they never ask me to review another manuscript and advising that they should expect never to get a ms sub from me again.<BR/><BR/>I get my reviews in on time anyway, but I'm a <I>volunteer</I> dammit. I can pretty much guarantee horrible backlash if Hauser and Fehr's proposal is ever tried. It's <I>offensive</I>.Bill Hookerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00366270586730870964noreply@blogger.com