skip to main | skip to sidebar

Journalology

Science publishing trends, ethics, peer review, and open access

No posts. Show all posts

No posts. Show all posts

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Matt Hodgkinson
Joe Dunckley

Disclaimer: The views and opinions in this blog are those of the poster alone.
A note on responses: We accept comments on all posts, but Matt will moderate them. Don't bother submitting spam; it won't be posted.

Add to Technorati Favorites

Creative Commons License

This material is Open Knowlege

free web site hit counter

Locations of visitors to this page

Subscribe to Journalology on your mobile phone

▼ 2011 (2)
- ▼ January (2)
  - Who are WebmedCentral?
  - What is WebmedCentral?

► 2010 (26)
- ► October (2)
  - Editing Wikipedia - for scientists
  - Joining PLoS ONE
- ► September (3)
- ► August (5)
- ► July (2)
  - The stuff we didn't have time to blog about in Jul...
  - Elsevier experiments with peer review
- ► June (2)
  - Green is no goal
  - Literature hacks: PubMed searches by RSS
- ► May (4)
- ► March (2)
  - Peer review in the dock
  - Peter Suber's open access word contest
- ► February (2)
  - Article-level metrics
  - Literature hack: context search
- ► January (4)

► 2008 (6)
- ► August (6)

► 2007 (72)
- ► December (1)
  - Funding for publication ethics research
- ► November (3)
- ► October (4)
- ► September (8)
- ► August (2)
- ► July (4)
- ► June (7)
- ► May (2)
- ► April (10)
- ► March (9)
- ► February (11)
- ► January (11)

Recent comments

Twitter

Open access feed

The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics

everyONE - the PLoS ONE community blog

BioMed Central

Blogosphere

Journalology links

ArXiv articles on electronic or journal publishing
ArXiv articles on open access
ArXiv articles on peer review
Biomedical Digital Libraries
BMJ - Authorship
BMJ - Other
BMJ - Peer review
BMJ - Research and publication ethics
CMAJ
Committee on Publication Ethics
Council of Science Editors
Cybermetrics - International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics
E-LIS - e-prints in library and information science
Essays of an Information Scientist - Eugene Garfield
European Association of Science Editing
Executable articles - ensuring replication of results
Experimental data checker for chemistry
Free Medical Journals
Information Community News
JAMA and Archives
Journal of Digital Information
Journal of Visual Experiments
Journalology--or what editors do (BMJ 1990;301:756-9)
Medical Journal of Australia
Nature peer review trial and debate
Open Access Now
Open Access Research
Pediatrics
Philica
Physics in the social web
PhysicsWeb - open access debate
Research Information
ScientificCommons
Scientists for Global Responsibility
Scientometrics
Stephen Lock at the BMJ
The Parable of the Anarchists Annual Meeting
The Scientist
The Truth
Weasel's Manual of Apologies for Misbehaving Monopolists
Wikipedia on academic publishing
Wikipedia on open access
Wikipedia on Peer review
Wikipedia on scientific misconduct
World Association of Medical Editors

Tools to search the literature

academic editor (1)

academic freedom (1)

acupuncture (1)

add-ons (1)

aids denialism (1)

alternatives (1)

american chemical society (2)

anesthesiology (1)

animal research (1)

annotated (1)

anonymity (1)

archivangelism (1)

arms (1)

article-level metrics (1)

ArXiv (1)

authoratory (1)

Authorship (4)

autism (1)

award (1)

Bad science (6)

barriers (1)

Ben Goldacre (3)

bentham open (2)

bioinformation (1)

Biology Direct (3)

BioMed Central (9)

black sheep (2)

blinding (1)

blogging (3)

blogs (1)

BMC Bioinformatics (1)

bmc series (1)

bmj (6)

boycott (1)

bruce charlton (1)

brussels declaration (1)

cell (1)

CERN (1)

China (3)

citations (3)

co-authors (1)

Cochrane (1)

comic (1)

comments (1)

community peer review (7)

companies (1)

competing interests (3)

complementary and alternative medicine (1)

cope (3)

copyright (5)

creative commons (2)

Criticisms (2)

data mining (4)

database (1)

David Weinberger (1)

deceased (2)

declarations (1)

domain-specific repositories (1)

e-biosci (1)

e01d628ea6bde8cb693f45cc7045cda8 (1)

editor (1)

electrosmog (1)

elsevier (7)

eTBLAST (1)

ethics (2)

evil empire (1)

facebook (1)

fair use (1)

fast track (1)

figures (1)

Firefox (2)

fraud (3)

free biomedical images (1)

freedom of information (1)

front organisations (1)

fud (1)

future of the paper (3)

Game Theory (1)

Genes (1)

genome (1)

ghost authors (2)

gift authors (2)

Google Bomb (1)

Google Scholar (1)

gratis (1)

greasemonkey (1)

green open-access (1)

green party (1)

guardian (1)

h-index (1)

harnad (2)

hinari (1)

history of publishing (1)

homeopathy (1)

how to keep up (1)

hybrid journals (1)

hype (2)

ICMJE (2)

ihop (1)

Impact Factor (5)

industry (1)

jama (1)

jan velterop (2)

JIMR (1)

journal bundling (1)

journalology (2)

journals (10)

keywords (1)

Kfinder (1)

kooks (1)

Lancet (4)

Lancet Neurology (1)

language (1)

law (1)

legal (1)

libel (1)

libre (1)

life after death (1)

literature (1)

literature hacks (2)

living marxism (1)

lm (1)

mandates (1)

Mark Geier (1)

mashups (1)

matt cockerill (1)

media (2)

medical hypotheses (3)

Medline (1)

mercury (1)

mesh (1)

meta (1)

metrics (1)

mirrors (1)

misconduct (2)

monkeys (1)

monopolies (1)

mycoplasma (1)

national medical journal of india (1)

nature (4)

nejm (1)

nicknames (1)

non-commercial (1)

obscurity (1)

on topic (1)

online information (1)

open access (28)

Open Access News (1)

open choice (2)

open data (2)

open notebook science (1)

open peer review (5)

open science (2)

open-access (1)

ouija board (1)

oxford open (1)

PageRank (1)

paper (1)

Partnership for Research Integrity in Science and Medicine (1)

patents (1)

payment (1)

pcr (1)

peer review (16)

permission (1)

peter murray-rust (1)

peter suber (2)

petition (1)

phd (1)

philica (2)

plagiarism (3)

plos (4)

plos computational biology (1)

plos one (7)

plos too (1)

plugins (2)

political correctness (1)

post-publication peer review (1)

precautionary principle (1)

priority (1)

prism (1)

public library of science (1)

publication ethics (4)

publish or perish (1)

publishing (4)

pubmed (4)

pubnet (1)

pubreminer (1)

radio 4 (1)

reed elsevier (2)

reject (1)

repository (2)

research (2)

retrospectacle (1)

reuse (1)

review quality (1)

revolutionary communist party (1)

richard poynder (1)

richard smith (1)

rss (1)

satire (1)

science (6)

Science Creative Quarterly (1)

science media centre (1)

scientific journals international (2)

search (3)

Select Committee (1)

self-archiving (2)

sense about science (1)

seti (1)

social software (1)

society publishers (2)

solo09 (4)

solo10 (4)

species (1)

spin (1)

springer (2)

statistics (1)

stevan harnad (1)

sue (1)

tags (1)

technorati (1)

text mining (1)

The Filter (1)

the onion (1)

the scientist (1)

tim o'reilly (1)

tooth fairies (1)

transparency (1)

truth (1)

typos (2)

userscripts (1)

vanity publishing (2)

venter (1)

volunteer peer review (1)

wame (1)

Web 2.0 (4)

webmedcentral (2)

wifi (1)

wikipedia (2)

wikis (1)

wiley (2)

Download BioMed Central articles for text mining

Loading...

Why open access? Harvard University video

The Machine is Us/ing Us